Quote Originally Posted by Gaijin 06
Back up your assertion that a 4 year course must be better than a 3 year course, given that the material covered could be identical and taking 4 years to cover 3 years worth of material could be an indication of poorer secondary education and/or lazy timetables.
My dear friend, I didn't say the material is the same. Precisely what I said was that given the same amount of workload 'per year', 5 is more then 3.

You seem interested on reading only what you want to read.

And again, nothing against the UK unis. Simply that there people graduate in less time. That's it.