|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
|
Hi,
I'm about to move within Japan for the first time. I've heard many horror stories about people not getting their deposits back, so I'm getting a bit nervous. Is there anywhere I can refer to for laws/regulations regarding what can be taken out of a deposit and what counts as normal wear. How much of this is generally specified in the contract? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 604
|
If you are renting as yourself (ie non-Japanese young male) you will have a very tough time getting anything back. Seriously.
So how to avoid that. Simple. Camera. Still photos of everything as it was BEFORE you move in. Good quality prints is a must with a date stamp. Log a copy of these with the estate agent you use. On moving out when the apartment is again empty (and CLEANED) take the same shots again (still date stamped). That is your proof. When we rented with the apartment in my wife's name we got back ALL of the deposit. When I rented in my name I had to pay more than the deposit (that can happen too) I had not destroyed anything. The policy (depending very much on the city! Tokyo/ Yokohama renters must pay a "thank you" money when they renew the lease, Osaka has no such policy and no lease renewals. Renting is very, very different by area) was that the apartment had to be returned to a "like new" state and not to the "as I found it" state. So I got billed for a total redo of the floors, walls and ceiling. CAMERA evidence is key. English copy of your contract is also nice but never going to happen. Paying to get it translated is pretty prohibitively expensive (10,000 yen per page of 6 - 10 pages) Knowing what the provisions are for the return of the deposit is critical. Find an estate agent that you can trust or get a good referral. Where will you live? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
|
I guess some clarification is in order:
- The apartment is in my wife's name (Japanese), although my name is also in the contract - It's in Tokyo (Tama) - It was completely new when we moved in, so no use in saying "it was like that before" - The place we're moving to is not rental "So I got billed for a total redo of the floors, walls and ceiling. " I was under the impression that this is what the next tenant is supposed to pay for with the key money. So, the question remains. How do I find out what is required to get the deposit back for my current place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
SupremePot
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,596
|
Quote:
If apartment was new then it should be left in as close to new condition as possible. That means no scuffs and marks on walls, scratches on flooring etc. PS in my apartment I only get back 50,000 yen out of a 250,000 yen deposit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
SupremePot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,539
|
Quote:
Then again, I didn't kick the crap out of the place, there were no damages and only a few minor marks on the wall. YMMV. Welesley's advice is excellent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
GPG
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In front of a beer.
Posts: 12,447
|
I read somewhere that if you stay in the place for a long period (maybe 5 years or more), normal wear and tear doesn't count. And you don't have to pay the full price for new tatami--the scale goes down the longer you've lived there.
Get your wife to check the Internet on damage deposits--there are lots of sites explaining your rights and the law. You can pick up the booklet mentioned here for free at your city or prefecture office. http://www.tokyowithkids.com/fyi/___...ordtenant.html
__________________
It's too tiring to type it all the time, so mentally attach "just kidding" after all my posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Sensei
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
I wrote about my experience of this on my blog a while ago, hope it helps: Quote:
Last edited by myhobbyis : 2009-02-18 at 03:12 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 683
|
In my personal experience.... the only place I ever rented under my own name was a "no deposit" place to begin with. I paid one month's rent that was to cover replacing the tatami and wallpaper, as well as "insurance" against damages up to that amount, and it was in the original contract that as it was INSURANCE/CLEANING FEES and not DEPOSIT, it was never to be refunded. However, I didn't have to pay anything extra, even though there was definitely some damage to the floor that was my (accidental) doing, and I managed to bleach the windowsill in one of the rooms before I had the hang of which Japanese cleansers were for what kind of surface. Oops. They were very nice about it though... the damage to the flooring probably fell under wear and tear, the bleaching was either covered by the insurance money I paid or they were being nice about it since it was obviously not intentional, I don't know. But they could very well have charged me for those things, and didn't.
When my husband moved out of HIS old apartment at the same time, he got all of his deposit back. I didn't see the condition of the place when he moved in, though, so I'm not sure how different it was when he moved out. Then we rented a place together. We paid three months' rent deposit (two for the basic deposit and one as a "pet deposit"). We were NOT CHARGED for replacing the tatami or wallpaper... the landlord is legally required to do that for each new tenant ANYWAY, and at least in the Tokyo area it is USUALLY included in whatever fees you are charged when you move in. We were not charged when we moved OUT of any of those three places. In the last case, the dog even dug a hole in the tatami and I pointed it out to the landlord and apologized, and he said "We have to change the tatami anyway, so there's no charge." The only thing that was deducted from our deposit was for a hole in the paper on one of the closets in the Japanese room, that happened when we moved our own furniture. Oops. It was about 3000 yen for new closet paper, and we got our entire deposit back, including the pet deposit, even though the dog had chewed on some of the baseboards as well. I was expecting to be charged more than we were.... the landlord was very nice though and we had been there with a dog and baby for three years, I guess he figured that was normal wear and tear for our family???? Obviously, you hear the horror stories too. I would give the landlord a chance to be decent about it first though. "Normal wear and tear" is NOT supposed to be deducted from the deopsit, and while that depends on the individual's definition of "normal," in my experience I've never been charged for anything other than the closet paper, where there was obviously an actual hole. I really think it depends on the landlord. If you're in Tokyo, you've probably already paid for the tatami and wallpaper, so if they do try to charge you for that check the contract (or get your wife to if its above your Japanese level) and I would argue that... but give them a chance first, some landlords are decent people. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
The photo evidence is right, but also look into the ACTUAL limitations of what the deposit is supposed to cover. The landlord will try to rip you off as par for the course, but a mention of zٔ (shougakusaiban sho [small claims court]) and an airing of the landlord's lies and deceit in public will often win you a little favor. Stand up for your rights, Japanese will lie to your face and smile whilst trying to rob you, as witnessed by the recent drunken politician and his lies.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
|
All these horror stories are making me nervous...
I had a look at my contract, and it basically says that normal wear and tear should not be charged. A cleaning fee is stipulated. Apart from that, there is a list of examples of what is covered and what is not. Tatami, wallpaper etc. is covered. Some of the things that were listed as potentially not covered, were oily walls etc. in the kitchen as a result of bad cleaning (exactly what the line between this and normal usage is is beyond me). There was a similar clause re. mildew in the bathroom as well. Anyway, I'll play nice and let my wife do the talking as far as possible. She's from Osaka and not one to take crap from old corrupt landlords ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 14
|
I've lived in this country for over 30 years and moved in and out of apartments and houses the whole time. I have always been amazed at how nice the agent is when you are moving in and how mean they are when you are moving out. Going over the contract thoroughly at the outset and taking lots of good pictures is excellent advice. It is true that some agents are better and more reasonable than others. At one point I decided that it is best not to expect anything to come back from the deposit and then fight for every penny and be happy if you can get anything at all back. --Basically a "hope for the best but prepare for the worst" philosophy. It's true also that the longer you live in a place the less you can expect to get back.
Here is one strategy that a friend told me about but I have to admit now that I have never actually tried. The problem about getting your money back is that they have it in their possession and as you know that's 9/10ths of the law so you are at their mercy. Not a very good bargaining position. But how about this? You give your notice one or two months in advance and then don't pay your rent for those last one or two months. If they have an equivalent of one or two month's deposit they are holding and you are hoping to get that back, you can "take it back" by not paying that last one or two month's worth of rent. Don't spend it, just hold it and at the end, tell them that you have it for them and it can all get negotiated at the closing. Sure they will squeal like hell when that last month's rent doesn't get paid on time at the beginning of the month and you are still living there but you can stall them for a couple of weeks hemming and hawing around with them until you are ready to move out. What are they going to do, kick you out? You're already moving so that's not an issue! Now when you get the place all cleaned up and show it to them and they are deciding about how much they are going to return to you, they are only talking about the last little bit of your money that they already have. If they can convince you that you do owe them because of actual damages you can agree to pay it from the deposit they owe you. Then the remainder of the deposit goes towards what you owe them for the last one or two month's rent and you toss in whatever else you owe them from the rent money you have set aside. At least this allows you to negotiate from a position of strength. As opposed to the "excuse me for living, can I please have a little of my money back?" position they'd prefer to have you in. The trick would be to keep it all polite and not allow them to realize that you did it on purpose because if they get mad they may be less likely to listen to reason about how much you owe them from the deposit. At least this way if they do get totally unreasonable and you do not agree with them about what you owe them, it is still up to you about how much you will pay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
GjyutsuPot Doshu
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,071
|
Been here 10 years and lived in 5 places. Of the 4 where I've vacated, I've never EVER had such an attitude. Always got back 95% of my deposits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 604
|
In truth it is solely dependent on where you live and who you landlord is. Also the estate agents play a role.
Osaka has some of the best rules for renters and Tokyo has by far the worst. I agree with the statement that estate agents are nice on coming and evil on going. Unless you are selling then they are nice to you. Of course I have never had a problem with company or company subsidized housing. No deposits and usually only request cleaning fees. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
I too had never faced the problem until I vacated an apartment we'd been in for around 4 years. And I think like Glenski, moving apartments every 2 years may spare you from huge redecoration charges more. It's like the estate agents want to get their 'pound of flesh' from long stay residents from what they lose out from not getting a new resident's key money. If you think about it this is where their big money lies. And in the coming harsh economic times which estate agent is going to survive? The one who has books full of long term residents who they only take their commision of each month's rent or the one making new contracts constantly and reaping the perks of key money and a reputation among landlords that if they use them they'll insure they don't have to pay out out themselves on redecoration? So the system of some estate agents (naming names, the story I related above was with mini mini) seems to punish you for staying in the same place for a long time. There seemed to be little rising scale of acceptable wear and tear against length of stay (I know Hijinx said legally it is otherwise but I think general practise and legality have long since parted company in this industry ). It was a new place as well and I think that plays a factor because the difference in what can be charged for a new or second tenant apartment and an old apartment is marked in this country were the 'new' is god . The estate agent in that situation wants to acrew as much money as possible in the apartments 'golden years' of the first 5 years. As Welesley also says, people renting apartments arranged by a company suffer little of this. I worked in the office of an eikaiwa and the estate agent we used bent over backwards to accomodate because a regular no hassle flow of residents is money in the bank for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 604
|
As an aside to the company places.
The "status" of the company matters too. My wife always got the best apartments, once a 90square metre 4 LDK, just because the company wanted to keep here happy. Companies with relationships with the estate agencies always do well. They rarely get screwed with bad landlords. It would harm the ongoing contracts. Solo people get screwed (does not matter the nationality, the fudosan screws young Japanese people just as badly) All matters of the contracts are negotiable, empty apartments are costing someone money. The landlords have loans on these places. You can usually negotiate down the key money as well as grind down the fudosan. Especially if the apartment has been on the market for a while. Or try to get a couple thousand off the monthly rent. Always get it in the contract that the fees the landlord wants to clean and whatever never go above the key money payment. Moving every 2 years is fine. If you stay longer than 3 you can NEVER be evicted and it is very tough to raise the rent. If you own letting people stay more than 3 years is dangerous as they end up having too many rights (like 1 year notice to kick them out {Osaka}) The dodgey tax accountants of the landlords will "double dip" and that is technically not illegal. They will also claim enormous expenses for advertising, cleaning, repairs etc. All business expenses??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 415
|
I have moved a couple of times in japan and both times I only paid a small cleaning fee for the apartments, so I got back practically all my deposit.
You will find most Landlords are very reasonable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
GrandMasterPot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth (aka Planet of the Apes)
Posts: 1,207
|
A rule of thumb on the security deposit is you would get back about 50%. Even if you left the place clean, the landlord or his/her agent need to bring in the cleaning service before the next tenant come in. This is in Tokyo, by the way.
__________________
don't like my opinions? just chill and look at the pix on the left. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 86
|
I won't be surprised if I don't get back any of my 50,000 yen deposit. My floor is damaged with dents and scratches from my deskchair, plus some marks from mats outside my bathroom and in my toilet. Seems like they weren't meant to be used on wooden floors.
But yeah, from what I've heard from my friends, you can't bank on getting most of your deposit back, even if you leave the place in pretty good condition. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Sensei
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 667
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 91
|
I did the dont pay the last months rents trick the first time I move.
It works. now I am looking for a place to live and I am going to do it again ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
GjyutsuPot Doshu
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,197
|
Quote:
__________________
Eschew obfuscation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 67
|
Jacque (and others), if the agent is often the culprit, are there any specific housing agencies that are 'known' for hording the depost? Big agencies? Small agencies? Local? National?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
|
It depends what your deposits where!
If you find the right person that pays you every thing you can not take with when moving than you wont have any problems! Anyways it will be very hard to get your deposits back that you spend on the kitchen or on the flooring! I know what I'm talking about. Even though we just had cheap vinyl tiles I was pissed off not getting anything when we moved out!
__________________
gFor an instant, love can transform the world.h Last edited by Wendygirl : 2009-03-17 at 02:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
|
Seems my paranoia was unfounded. It took a while for them to pay up, but I just got my entire deposit (minus cleaning fee as stipulated in the contract) back. I moved out in the middle of the month, so they also gave me back half the rent for that month.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|